<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value in fragmentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iterativelearning.org/iterativeblog/2009/12/11/value-in-fragmentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iterativelearning.org/iterativeblog/2009/12/11/value-in-fragmentation/</link>
	<description>Random reflections on teaching, tech, and instructional design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://iterativelearning.org/iterativeblog/2009/12/11/value-in-fragmentation/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iterativelearning.org/iterativeblog/?p=603#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the suggestion on the Laurel Richardson book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the suggestion on the Laurel Richardson book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Keefer</title>
		<link>http://iterativelearning.org/iterativeblog/2009/12/11/value-in-fragmentation/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Keefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iterativelearning.org/iterativeblog/?p=603#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Phil, thank you for stopping by and sharing your thoughts on my research direction. 

I find that your style, in this one single post, has elements of that more traditional academic-speak where you as researcher maintains a distance  between yourself and your writing. Of course, this is only one post, though I find myself drawn to processing and learning in the very act of writing (as per Laurel Richardson&#039;s work, which has greatly influenced my thinking). In many ways, I suppose my interest is developing into some form of study where those &quot;fragmented, truncated, rough-hewn thinking&quot; nuggets can in turn reveal profound learning shifts. 

In some ways, my research interests are a bit different from my practitioner work in project management and ISD!

Jeffrey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, thank you for stopping by and sharing your thoughts on my research direction. </p>
<p>I find that your style, in this one single post, has elements of that more traditional academic-speak where you as researcher maintains a distance  between yourself and your writing. Of course, this is only one post, though I find myself drawn to processing and learning in the very act of writing (as per Laurel Richardson&#8217;s work, which has greatly influenced my thinking). In many ways, I suppose my interest is developing into some form of study where those &#8220;fragmented, truncated, rough-hewn thinking&#8221; nuggets can in turn reveal profound learning shifts. </p>
<p>In some ways, my research interests are a bit different from my practitioner work in project management and ISD!</p>
<p>Jeffrey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

